February 13, 2014
by Steve Malone
A spectrogram is a visual way of representing the signal strength, or “loudness”, of a signal over time at various frequencies for a site. Not only can one see whether there is more or less energy at a particular frequency, but one can also see how energy levels vary over time. In order to visualize the three variables here (time, frequency and signal strength) one can not use a simple wiggly-line plot like a seismogram (amplitude vs. time) but rather needs to plot a third parameter. Traditionally for spectrograms, this third item is color. Thus spectrograms use color for signal strength, warm for strong and cold for weak. Frequency is represented on the vertical axis and like seismograms, time is on the horizontal axis. The graph here illustrates an example of a smallish earthquake followed by a larger earthquake on a spectrogram from a single station. The black line above the colorful spectrogram is a seismogram. See how much more information is present in the spectrogram. When spectrograms from more than one station are used together for the same time period their value is further enhanced.
Because interpreting spectrograms is quite complicated we have written a comprehensive document with extensive examples to help the public understand them. This document is based on material provided by Jackie Caplan-Auerbach and Seth Moran, both very experienced users of spectrograms, particularly in volcanic situations. Don't worry that, even after studying these examples carefully you find yourself sometimes being confused. There are many cases in which even the most experienced analyst may have trouble determining what is really going on. Although spectrograms can be confusing to read our feeling is that the more data the public can see the more educated they become and this decreases the likelihood of wild speculations, predictions and irresponsible comments.
Within reason we are happy to follow up and answer questions or address concerns that people have concerning spectrogram signals. However, we strongly suggest that when you have a question, first do as scientists do and try to figure it out yourself. You should look for other examples of your observation at different times or on different stations. Look at the examples in our FAQ and see if you can find anything similar. Think about the different things that can shake the ground and come up with your best interpretation and if still confused send us a comment or question. Be patient because our small staff has many responsibilites of which responding to comments and e-mailed question is not the highest priority.
Also, be warned, spectrograms can be facinating and lots of time can be "wasted" trying to figure out every different looking signal. I used to feel I was wasting time reviewing them but once I became fairly experienced I realized spectorgrams are just another way of watching the earth wiggle and its got lots of ways of doing that. Please check out our "What is a Spectrogram" page before even looking at them.
- Ice avalanches on Cascade volcanoes
- A New View On What's Shaking on the Cascade Volcanoes
- Seismic Spectrograms - A new way to look at wiggles
- The final football game analysis
- The Football Game Experiment Continues
- Seismic Game Analysis
- PNSN Earth-shaking Seahawks Experiment
- Large Mount Baker debris Avalanche this fall
- Speedy ETS in the works
- Peppy seismic swarm 20 km NW of Mount St Helens
- 2014 (7)
- October (1)
- September (1)
- August (1)
- June (1)
- April (3)
- March (4)
- February (1)
- January (2)
- December (1)
- November (2)
- October (3)
- September (1)
- August (3)
- July (2)
- June (4)
- May (4)
- April (2)
- The wech-o-meter takes over all of Cascadia
- Keystone Cops: Italy prosecutes seismologists for failure to predict deadly quake
- UFOs in eastern Washington? No, rather UTEs (Unidentified Terrestrial Events)
- New Sodo Seattle Liquefaction Array Installed
- Why we should constantly watch the deformation of the seafloor
- Mystery chirp near Newberry Volcano
- Planting seismographs causes earthquakes? or maybe ice-quakes?
- Tunneling rumbles south under Capitol Hill
- 15 years of mostly silent magma inflation near Three Sisters, Oregon
- Mount Hood earthquake swarm of Feb 23, 2012
- Web glitches: duplicate (and even triplicate!) earthquakes
- How earthquake magnitude scales work
- Mine blast masquerades as volcanic tremor
- The Spokane Swarm about 10 years ago
- Another hum around Mount St. Helens
- Slow slip: A new kind of earthquake under our feet
- PNSN and social media
- 3am M3.4 earthquake in St. Helens Seismic Zone
- The wrong kind of volcano noise
- Fast chatter on Rainier an hour ago
- Can slush-mageddon trigger earthquakes?
- Rainier Repeating Earthquakes Update and Comparison with Weather Patterns
- 22-minutes drumbeat icequakes(?)
- Mount Rainier popping away
- Repeating Earthquakes on Mount Rainier - are glaciers the culprit?
- Debunking another SEC football myth by the PAC-12
- One year ago, Seattle Seahawks 12th Man Earthquake
- The odds this year of a megaquake on the Pacific Northwest coast
- Is the plague of great earthquakes this decade a sign of increased danger?
- Nile Valley landslide talks to PNSN seismologists
- Good vs evil in central US earthquake hazard analysis
- Why does a volcano scream?
- Predicting big quakes from patterns of little ones
- 1-hour warning for Japanese M9 earthquake?
- Sound Transit train under Interlaken keeps a rollin'
- Invisible changes under the hood at the PNSN
- Sound Transit Tunneling Noise
- "Visionary" toads
- Earthquake early warning in the PNW
- November (1)
- December (13)